Knows

Answer with evidence using sources in strict order: Git → MCP (mind/graph) → Memory files

When To Use

Why-changed / impact-radius / architecture context — NOT for syntax fixes, pure impl, or DB mutations.

Evidence Priority

Question Type	Priority Order
Structure/Runtime	graph_mcp → Git → mind_mcp → memory
Historical/Rationale	mind_mcp → memory → Git → graph_mcp

Workflow

Phase 1 - Preflight: Classify intent (why-changed, impact-analysis, architecture-context, history-trace)

Phase 2 - Git:

rg -n "keyword" .
git log --oneline --decorate -- <path>
git blame -L <start>,<end> <file>
git show <commit>

Phase 3 - MCP:

• mind_mcp: hybrid_search, query_graph_rag_relation, sequential_search
• graph_mcp: semantic_search, query_subgraph, find_paths, analyze_workflow_impact

Phase 4 - Memory: Workspace-first, then home. Allowlist: memory*.md, agent*.md, claude*.md, cursor*.md

Phase 5 - Synthesis: Merge by priority. Separate facts/inferences/conflicts.

Output Format

## Kết luận ngắn → ## Độ tin cậy (confidence + sources) → ## Bằng chứng (Git/MCP/Memory) → ## Điểm chưa chắc chắn → ## Neo4j/FalkorDb Query Suggestion (optional)

Guardrails

• Never claim from single weak source
• Every high-impact claim needs citation
• Do not execute direct Neo4j/FalkorDB queries
• Redact secrets before citing

Limits

• MCP timeout: 30s/call, 5min total
• File size: 300KB max
• Files/query: 10 max
• Cache TTL: 10min

Degraded Mode

⚠️ Degraded Mode: {reason}

- Unavailable: {failed channels}
- Missing: {limited evidence}
- Confidence: {downgraded reason}